SOUTHEAST ASIA
PHILIPPINES
The Philippines became a GCERF partner country in 2018. GCERF invested USD 12.2 million supporting 49 civil society organisations to foster long-term peace and prevent extremism from taking root.
- Lanao del Sur
- Maguindanao
- North Cotabato
- South Cotabato
- Saranggani
- Sulu
Background & Context
Understanding Violent
Extremism in The Philippines
For years, the Philippines has struggled with violent extremist and separatist groups in the south of the country. A long-running movement for independence led to the formation of the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (BARMM) following peace talks and negotiations between the central government and separatist groups. While this is a step forward for peace, violent extremist (VE) groups, including local groups inspired by ISIS, continue to operate and recruit members. An investment of USD 5.3 million supporting the active involvement of civil society organisations in the implementation of the National Action Plan on Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism – Philippines (NAP P/CVE-Philippines) ended in 2025.
GCERF'S UNIQUE INVESTMENT MODEL
Country
Support Mechanism
GCERF pioneers a unique model of investment designed to promote a whole-of-society approach and ensure the sustainability of our programmes. Under this model, in each partner country, we support national governments in establishing a steering committee called the Country Support Mechanism (CSM).
In the Philippines, the CSM is chaired by the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) and brings together relevant government agencies, civil society organisations, and donor representatives to provide strategic direction for the programmes, ensure results, and progressively inherit ownership of funding community-level efforts to prevent violent extremism.
Key Drivers of Violent Extremism
Identity-based conflict and political rivalry
In parts of the Philippines, violent extremism is often rooted in long-standing identity-based tensions involving ethnic, religious, and clan dynamics. Political rivalries also translate at the local level, which can deepen divisions and create openings for armed groups to mobilise support or exploit grievances.
Youth marginalisation and radical influences
A significant driver of vulnerability to violent extremism is the marginalisation of young people. Limited access to quality education, employment opportunities, and civic participation can create a sense of frustration and lack of belonging.
Governance gaps and fragile institutions
Weak governance structures and uneven delivery of basic services remain key factors contributing to instability. In some areas, limited state presence, corruption, and inconsistent rule of law reduce public trust in institutions and create environments where non-state armed actors can exert influence.
Results at a Glance
Key Results
Investment & grant figures updated May 2026 · Programme results updated December 2025