WESTERN BALKANS
KOSOVO
- Kosovska Mitrovica District
- Peja
- Gjakova
- Prizreni
- Ferizaji
- Gjilani
- Prishtina
Background & Context
Understanding Violent
Extremism in Kosovo
The background of violent extremism (VE) in Kosovo is shaped by a combination of post-conflict social dynamics, structural vulnerabilities, and the challenges associated with the rehabilitation and reintegration (R&R) of returnees from foreign conflict zones.
Kosovo has repatriated a significant number of its citizens who travelled to foreign conflict zones, making rehabilitation and reintegration (R&R) a central pillar of its response to violent extremism (VE) risks. These reintegration efforts are closely linked to broader prevention challenges, particularly among young people, who are considered highly vulnerable. This vulnerability is shaped by structural factors such as high unemployment, difficult labour market conditions, identity-related tensions, and a polarised education system. These pressures are further reinforced by widespread access to technology, which increases exposure to online content that can facilitate radicalisation and the spread of extremist narratives.
GCERF'S UNIQUE INVESTMENT MODEL
Country
Support Mechanism
GCERF pioneers a unique model of investment designed to promote a whole-of-society approach and ensure the sustainability of our programmes. Under this model, in each partner country, we support national governments in establishing a steering committee called the Country Support Mechanism (CSM).
In Kosovo, CSM is chaired by the Director of The Department of Public Safety in the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Kosovo and brings together relevant government agencies, civil society organisations and donor representatives to provide strategic direction for the programmes, ensure results, and progressively inherit ownership of funding community-level efforts to prevent violent extremism.
Key Drivers of Violent Extremism
Institutional mistrust and fragmented governance relations
Lack of trust in institutions, as well as limited dialogue between central and local government, creates space for extremist actors to exploit dissatisfaction and present themselves as alternative sources of authority or support.
Ethnonationalist tensions
Ethnonationalist tensions can contribute to violent extremism by deepening divisions between communities and reinforcing narratives of “us versus them”, creating fertile ground for extremist messaging.
Political unrest and mis/disinformation
Political unrest and mis/disinformation can contribute to VE by weakening trust in institutions and distorting public perceptions of political and social issues. This creates an environment where extremist narratives spread more easily and gain credibility among dissatisfied groups.
Results at a Glance
Key Results
Investment & grant figures updated May 2026 · Programme results updated December 2025