East and Southern Africa
KENYA
GCERF began investing in Kenya in 2018, with a total investment of USD 13 million to date aimed at addressing the drivers of violent extremism and strengthening community resilience. Violent extremism has posed a significant threat to Kenya since the late 1990s, following the Al-Qaeda bombing of the United States Embassy in Nairobi. While large-scale attacks have become less frequent in recent years, smaller-scale incidents continue to occur, particularly in the Coastal and North-Eastern regions of the country.
- Mandera
- Marsabit
- Wajir
- Tana River
- Lamu
Background & Context
Understanding Violent
Extremism in Kenya
Kenya’s National Strategy to Counter Violent Extremism (NSCVE) identifies violent extremism linked to Salafi-jihadi ideology as the country’s main security threat. This ideology is promoted by groups such as Al-Shabaab and ISIS, which seek to expand their influence in the Horn of Africa. According to the Strategy, these groups take advantage of grievances rooted in real or perceived political exclusion, marginalisation, and alienation from the state and mainstream political life.
Alongside these transnational extremist organisations, Kenya has also experienced the rise of locally driven violent extremist movements. One example is the Mombasa Republican Council (MRC), which emerged from long-standing frustrations at the Coast over land ownership, economic inequality, and the perception that non-local communities dominate the regional economy. These grievances have contributed to local support for separatist and extremist narratives in some coastal areas.
GCERF'S UNIQUE INVESTMENT MODEL
Country
Support Mechanism
GCERF pioneers a unique model of investment designed to promote a whole-of-society approach and ensure the sustainability of our programmes. Under this model, in each partner country, we support national governments in establishing a steering committee called the Country Support Mechanism (CSM).
In Kenya, CSM is chaired by the National Counter-Terrorism Centre (NCTC) and includes representatives from the Ministry of Interior, county governments, donors, and independent think tanks. CSM provides strategic direction for the programmes, ensure results and progressively inherits ownership of funding community-level efforts to prevent violent extremism.
Key Drivers of Violent Extremism
Youth unemployment
High poverty and unemployment leave many youth without viable livelihoods, increasing their vulnerability to recruitment by non-state armed groups, including VE organisations.
Perceived marginalisation
Feeling of exclusion can weaken trust in state institutions and increase vulnerability to extremist narratives that exploit grievances and claims of injustice.
Lack of trust between community members and security actors
Limited trust in law enforcement forces can result from past abuses, perceived discrimination, or ineffective protection. It may reduce community cooperation with authorities, creating gaps that extremist groups can exploit.
Results at a Glance
Key Results
Investment & grant figures updated May 2026 · Programme results updated December 2025